Simon Jenkins takes on the NPPF

Our Chairman, Simon Jenkins, gave the keynote address at The Heritage Alliance AGM and Heritage Day event last week. His talk was called ‘Taking on the Plan’, and focused on our planning campaign work. As we don’t have a transcript of the speech, here’s a summary of the main points he raised. It’s not an official National Trust statement but it’s posted here so others can pick up on the main themes of his address and his personal view of the issues.

“Policy, not politics

‘Taking on the Plan’ was a carefully chosen title, reflecting the fact that our planning campaign has been based on policy, not politics. We don’t make a habit of criticising Government, but we couldn’t avoid making our position clear on the changes that were taking place in England as a result of the Localism Bill (now an Act) and the National Planning Policy Framework (#NPPF).

And the response was amazing – we’ve received more signatures to our public petition than there are members of the Conservative Party.

What’s wrong with the NPPF?

The planning reforms at stake are ill-conceived and they’ve come about as a consequence of serious lobbying by developer interests. They are a denial of planning in its traditional sense.

You can’t abandon planning in favour of just giving planning permission. The presumption in favour of sustainable development is particularly ill-defined – it gives a green light to all sorts of developments that would not otherwise be given the go-ahead.

Our position

We’ve tried to be a helpful voice in the debates, while at the same time using all our influence to present a clear challenge to the proposals as they stand. This is not always an easy balance to make. It’s hard to tell where things stand exactly at present, now the consultation has closed. If a poor version of the NPPF is the end result, we are prepared to make a large public noise again.

What needs to change? 

At present, the draft NPPF just doesn’t meet its own criteria. It doesn’t ensure localism, and it won’t promote growth – and these two objectives might in some ways be antithetical. We need to re-establish the sovereignty of the plan, to ensure sensible decisions are made about the future of the country.

Beautiful and ugly are words going out of fashion – we should be open about the need to protect things on aesthetic grounds as well as simply because they are old.  Listing the countryside would be one possible option, using the evidence we have about the character of the nation’s landscapes. Then we would know more clearly which bits of the countryside would tolerate development. (Our campaign has been mainly about the countryside.)

Keeping up our campaign

We need to keep up the pressure on the NPPF. We’ll need an effective transition to the new regime, and also we’ll need to mobilise voices to ensure that local plans are influenced at the local level. We need to concentrate on helping councils and communities to understand and value heritage – it’s not all about what we say to central Government.”

Simon Jenkins – National Trust chairman

Want to add your voice? Sign our petition and write to your MP via Planning for People. You can also follow us on Twitter and join the #planning4ppl debate and *like* us on Facebook for further opportunities to connect.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Simon Jenkins takes on the NPPF

  1. Pingback: Simon Jenkins ‘If a poor version of the #NPPF is the end result, we are prepared to make a large public noise again’ « Decisions, Decisions, Decisions

  2. With respect to these planning proposals what is the official NT policy towards wind turbines and wind farms?

    Dr F S Holland

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s